Bombay High Court: “Suppression or concealment of material facts is not advocacy — it is jugglery, manipulation, and misrepresentation, which has no place in equitable jurisdiction.” Imposes ₹5 Lakh Cost for Suppression of Facts in Slum Rehab Case — “Litigants Cannot Play Hide and Seek with the Court”

Bombay High Court: “Suppression or concealment of material facts is not advocacy — it is jugglery, manipulation, and misrepresentation, which has no place in equitable jurisdiction.” Imposes ₹5 Lakh Cost for Suppression of Facts in Slum Rehab Case — “Litigants Cannot Play Hide and Seek with the Court”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court (Division Bench of Justice A.S. Gadkari and Justice Kamal Khata) dismissed a review petition filed by an individual claiming entitlement to a rehabilitation tenement…
Bombay High Court Directs SSC and Union of India to Declare Results of Constable GD Candidates, Condemns Bureaucratic Delays, Orders SSC and Union to Release Constable GD Results — “Biometric Mismatch Not Attributable to Applicants”

Bombay High Court Directs SSC and Union of India to Declare Results of Constable GD Candidates, Condemns Bureaucratic Delays, Orders SSC and Union to Release Constable GD Results — “Biometric Mismatch Not Attributable to Applicants”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench), comprising Justice Vibha Kankanwadi and Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar, allowed a series of writ petitions filed by candidates whose results for recruitment…
Bombay high court

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Victim’s Family — “Correct Multiplier and Future Prospects Must Be Applied to Ensure Just Compensation” strengthen the binding nature of the Sarla Varma and Pranay Sethi guidelines in motor accident compensation cases

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench), presided by Justice R.M. Joshi, enhanced the compensation awarded to the legal heirs of a road accident victim, holding that the Motor…