Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Affirms Conviction for Cheque Bounce Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act: “Accused Cannot Complain of Prejudice If Absent Without Justification”

Home » Affirms Conviction for Cheque Bounce Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act: "Accused Cannot Complain of Prejudice If Absent Without Justification"
Bombay High Court Affirms Conviction for Cheque Bounce Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act: "Accused Cannot Complain of Prejudice If Absent Without Justification"
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Affirms Conviction for Cheque Bounce Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act: “Accused Cannot Complain of Prejudice If Absent Without Justification”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court dismissed two revision applications filed by the accused and upheld the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (NI Act). The accused…
Posted by Rawlaw January 23, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court issues sweeping directions to curb trademark misuse through fraudulent domain names — “Registrars, banks, and government bodies bound to act, dynamic plus injunctions approved”
  • Delhi High Court issues landmark directions to dismantle fraudulent domain name ecosystem misusing well-known trademarks — “Online soul of businesses must be protected, systemic reforms mandated”
  • Delhi High Court holds London as the juridical seat and bars the Indian challenge to the foreign arbitral award — “Part I of the Arbitration Act excluded by necessary implication, Section 34 petition not maintainable”
  • Delhi High Court strikes down compulsory use of select bank EDC terminals at petrol pumps — “Exclusive payment routing held disproportionate, dealers’ business autonomy protected”
  • Delhi High Court orders rectification of trademark register by cancelling ‘BSM’ mark — “Prior user rights prevail over later registration, bad faith adoption inferred”
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top