Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news Raw Law

Unfiltered Legal Insights

  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Limitation Period

Home - Limitation Period

Bombay High Court: “Delay Beyond 120 Days Cannot Be Condoned Under the Payment of Gratuity Act” — Court Quashes Appellate Authority’s Order Extending Limitation Period
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: “Delay Beyond 120 Days Cannot Be Condoned Under the Payment of Gratuity Act” — Court Quashes Appellate Authority’s Order Extending Limitation Period

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, set aside the order of the Industrial Court and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, which had condoned a…
Posted by Rawlaw October 28, 2025
Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Order: "Violation of Limitation Period Under Section 153 Renders Order Void; Procedural Irregularities Highlighted"
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Order: “Violation of Limitation Period Under Section 153 Renders Order Void; Procedural Irregularities Highlighted”

Court’s Decision The `Bombay High Court` quashed the reassessment order passed by the Income Tax Department under Section 143(3) read with Sections 147 and 144B of the Income Tax Act.…
Posted by Rawlaw December 28, 2024
Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award, Finds Claims Within Limitation Period Due to Acknowledgment of Debt, Rejects Counterclaims as Time-Barred for Not Being Part of Ongoing Negotiations”
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award, Finds Claims Within Limitation Period Due to Acknowledgment of Debt, Rejects Counterclaims as Time-Barred for Not Being Part of Ongoing Negotiations”

Court’s Decision: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by OPG Power Generation Pvt. Ltd. and Gita Power and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., upholding the arbitral tribunal’s award in favor of…
Posted by Rawlaw September 25, 2024

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court: “Unsuccessful Party Can Also Seek Section 9 Protection”; L&T Directed To Keep ₹150 Crore Bank Guarantee Alive In ONGC Arbitration
  • “He Who Seeks Equity Must Do Equity”: Supreme Court Holds Specific Performance Decree Becomes Inexecutable If Balance Sale Consideration Is Not Deposited Within Time
  • Bombay High Court Rejects Tenants’ Plea To Add New Developer; Says Application Prima Facie Appears “Moved And Financed” By Proposed Developer, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs
  • Bombay High Court Refuses To Cancel Bail In Pending Murder Appeal; Says “Bail Once Granted Ought Not To Be Cancelled” Without Strong Grounds
  • Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank And Phoenix ARC Officials Filed After Recovery Proceedings; Says “Personal Vendetta Writ Large”, Investigation Would Be Abuse Of Process
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top