Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

tribunal

Home - tribunal

compensation
Posted inNews

‘Tribunal Must Award Just and Fair Compensation’ — Delhi High Court Rejects Insurer’s Challenge to 75% Functional Disability & Notional Income of Animation Student

COURT’S DECISION The Court dismissed the insurer’s appeal and upheld the Tribunal’s award of ₹66,33,256 with 7.5% interest, holding that: The Tribunal correctly assessed the claimant’s notional income at ₹20,000…
Posted by Rawlaw November 8, 2025
motor accident
Posted inNews

Karnataka High Court Enhances Compensation by ₹1.68 Lakh in Motor Accident Case — “Tribunal Must Adopt Realistic Income While Calculating Just Compensation”

Court’s Decision The Karnataka High Court, presided over by Justice Umesh M. Adiga, allowed a Miscellaneous First Appeal filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement…
Posted by Rawlaw October 25, 2025
medical officer
Posted inNews

Kerala High Court Upholds Tribunal’s Decision: “Medical Officers Who Availed Deputation Benefits for Postgraduate Studies Must Opt for Speciality Cadre — Option Once Exercised Is Final and Binding”

Court’s Decision The Kerala High Court Division Bench comprising Justice Anil K. Narendran and Justice Muralee Krishna S. dismissed a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the…
Posted by Rawlaw October 6, 2025
proeprty rights
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Protects Property Rights Amidst Non-Functional MCD Tribunal: “No Precipitative Action Until Appeal is Heard”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court, while exercising its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution, directed the Municipal Corporation not to take any coercive or precipitative action against…
Posted by Rawlaw October 1, 2025
canara bank
Posted inNews

Supreme Court: “Tribunal and High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence; once enquiry held fair, interference with penalty is impermissible” – Compulsory retirement of Canara Bank employee upheld

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Canara Bank, setting aside the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal and the judgment of the Karnataka High Court…
Posted by Rawlaw September 10, 2025
Patna High Court: “Disputed Questions of Fact Must Be Decided by Tribunal, Not Writ Court” — Writ Petition Withdrawn with Liberty, Interim Relief Directed Under Section 112 CGST/BGST Act
Posted inNews

Patna High Court: “Disputed Questions of Fact Must Be Decided by Tribunal, Not Writ Court” — Writ Petition Withdrawn with Liberty, Interim Relief Directed Under Section 112 CGST/BGST Act

Court’s Decision The Patna High Court refused to adjudicate on disputed factual issues concerning reversal of input tax credit (ITC) under the CGST/BGST Act, 2017, and permitted the petitioner to…
Posted by Rawlaw August 23, 2025
property tax
Posted inNews

Kerala High Court Quashes Tribunal Order That Interfered with Property Tax Reclassification; Holds Appeal by Unregistered Association Incompetent: “Remedies Under Rule 16 Are Available Only to Owners of Buildings”

Court’s Decision The Kerala High Court allowed the writ petition filed by the Municipality and set aside the order passed by the Tribunal for Local Self-Government Institutions. The Court held…
Posted by Rawlaw June 25, 2025
arbitration
Posted inNews

Calcutta High Court Refers ₹71 Crore Loan Dispute to Arbitration Despite Objection on Limitation: “All Objections, Including Arbitrability, Must Be Raised Before the Tribunal”

Court’s Decision: In SREI Equipment Finance Limited v. Krishna Arjun Enterprise & Ors., the Calcutta High Court referred a ₹71 crore loan recovery dispute to arbitration, rejecting objections related to…
Posted by Rawlaw June 20, 2025

Recent News

  • “Comparable Sale Instances Must Prevail” – Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation After Finding Reference Court Erred in Ignoring Higher Valuation Evidence
  • “Arbitration Award Set Aside: Bombay High Court Slams ‘Denial of Natural Justice’ and Declares ‘An Arbitrator Must Give Reasons’ in a Powerful Ruling on Fundamental Policy Breach”
  • “Recovery Certificate Invalidated: Bombay High Court Issues a Powerful Warning That ‘Reasons Are the Soul of Justice’ While Reiterating That ‘A Registrar Must Apply His Mind Before Enforcing Recovery’”
  • Bombay High Court Declares That “A Clean Document Cannot Coexist With a Tainted Transaction,” Sets Aside Conviction After Finding Critical Contradictions in Evidence
  • Recovery Certificate under Section 101 Set Aside: Bombay High Court Holds That “Recording of Reasons Is a Fundamental Requirement” and Directs Denovo Inquiry for Non-Compliance with Rule 86A–86F
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top