Supreme Court Clarifies "Experience Marks" for Outsourced Workers: “Recruitment Criteria Must Be Interpreted Fairly and Inclusively, Especially for Outsourced Workers Whose Contributions Are Often Equivalent to Regular Employees”

Supreme Court Clarifies “Experience Marks” for Outsourced Workers: “Recruitment Criteria Must Be Interpreted Fairly and Inclusively, Especially for Outsourced Workers Whose Contributions Are Often Equivalent to Regular Employees”

Court’s Decision: The Supreme Court upheld the Punjab and Haryana High Court's decision, which granted 0.5 experience marks to an outsourced worker employed as a clerk-cum-typist. The Court ruled that…
UPLOAD PENDING - Delhi High Court: Can a Magistrate or Special Court Question an FIR's Validity or Quash It During an Investigation? Affirms That Magistrates and Special Courts Are Limited to Ensuring Procedural Fairness and Must Not Interfere with FIR Validity

Delhi High Court: Can a Magistrate or Special Court Question an FIR’s Validity or Quash It During an Investigation? Affirms That Magistrates and Special Courts Are Limited to Ensuring Procedural Fairness and Must Not Interfere with FIR Validity

Court’s Decision The High Court emphasized the following principles: Investigative Authority: Magistrates and Special Courts do not have the authority to interfere with ongoing investigations or question the validity of…