Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Bombay High Court

Home - Bombay High Court - Page 2

slum redevelopment
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court rejects Section 34 challenge to arbitral award in Malad slum redevelopment dispute — “scope under Section 34 is narrow; unpleaded grounds cannot be introduced through oral argument”

1. Court’s decision The Bombay High Court has dismissed a Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award involving a decades-long dispute over multiple parcels of tribal land in Malad (East),…
Posted by Rawlaw November 20, 2025
territorial jurisdiction
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court holds that territorial jurisdiction must be interpreted to advance justice: “Hyper-technical objections cannot defeat statutory rights under compensation law”

Court’s decision The Bombay High Court set aside the Commissioner for Employees’ Compensation’s order dismissing a compensation application for lack of territorial jurisdiction. The Court held that territorial jurisdiction under…
Posted by Rawlaw November 18, 2025
ndps
Posted inNews

Supreme Court sets aside Bombay High Court bail orders in NDPS case, holding that “statutory satisfaction under Section 37 cannot be presumed”

Court’s decision The Supreme Court set aside both Bombay High Court orders granting bail to Vigin K. Varghese in prosecutions under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 arising…
Posted by Rawlaw November 18, 2025
Bombay High Court: “Truth Is the Foundation of Justice” – Court Refuses Relief After Finding Deliberate Falsehoods in 12-Year Delay Challenge to Auction Sale
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: “Truth Is the Foundation of Justice” – Court Refuses Relief After Finding Deliberate Falsehoods in 12-Year Delay Challenge to Auction Sale

Court’s decision The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the refusal to condone a 12-year delay in filing a revision against the confirmation of a cooperative bank auction…
Posted by Rawlaw November 16, 2025
Bombay High Court: “Courts must sit in the armchair of the consumer to assess trademark confusion” — Matter remanded for fresh determination of deceptive similarity between SNN and SNT popcorn packaging
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: “Courts must sit in the armchair of the consumer to assess trademark confusion” — Matter remanded for fresh determination of deceptive similarity between SNN and SNT popcorn packaging

Court’s decision The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, set aside the order of the District Judge that had restrained the appellant from using the trademark “SNT” for popcorn maize, holding…
Posted by Rawlaw November 14, 2025
Bombay High Court: “Trademark protection extends even to illiterate consumers” — Court upholds injunction restraining sale of deceptively similar bidi bundles despite packaging irregularities
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: “Trademark protection extends even to illiterate consumers” — Court upholds injunction restraining sale of deceptively similar bidi bundles despite packaging irregularities

Court’s decision The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, upheld the trial court’s order granting a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from using a trade-dress and label deceptively similar to the…
Posted by Rawlaw November 14, 2025
Bombay High Court: “Trademark protection cannot extend beyond territorial goodwill” — Court upholds concurrent use of ‘Indian Express’ and ‘The New Indian Express’ in separate regions
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: “Trademark protection cannot extend beyond territorial goodwill” — Court upholds concurrent use of ‘Indian Express’ and ‘The New Indian Express’ in separate regions

Court’s decision The Bombay High Court, per Justice R.I. Chagla, refused to restrain the publication of The New Indian Express in Maharashtra and other western states, holding that both Indian…
Posted by Rawlaw November 14, 2025
compensation
Posted inNews

“Comparable Sale Instances Must Prevail” – Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation After Finding Reference Court Erred in Ignoring Higher Valuation Evidence

COURT’S DECISION The High Court partly allowed the land-owners’ appeals and dismissed the State’s appeals. The Court enhanced the compensation for land acquired for a percolation tank in Babhalgaon by…
Posted by Rawlaw November 12, 2025
arbitration set aside
Posted inNews

“Arbitration Award Set Aside: Bombay High Court Slams ‘Denial of Natural Justice’ and Declares ‘An Arbitrator Must Give Reasons’ in a Powerful Ruling on Fundamental Policy Breach”

COURT’S DECISION The High Court set aside both the arbitral award dated 16 January 1998 and the District Judge’s impugned order dated 21 October 2011, holding that the award suffered…
Posted by Rawlaw November 11, 2025
recovery certificate
Posted inNews

“Recovery Certificate Invalidated: Bombay High Court Issues a Powerful Warning That ‘Reasons Are the Soul of Justice’ While Reiterating That ‘A Registrar Must Apply His Mind Before Enforcing Recovery’”

COURT’S DECISION The High Court set aside the impugned orders granting recovery certificates under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The Court held that the Deputy Registrar…
Posted by Rawlaw November 11, 2025

Posts pagination

Previous page 1 2 3 4 … 50 Next page

Recent News

  • Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
  • Supreme Court of India observes that “registration under Section 12AA is not by itself sufficient to claim exemption under Section 80G” — Court issues notice in dispute concerning the charitable versus religious character of trust activities
  • Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh high court holds that “compassionate appointment is not a vested right and must strictly conform to the governing rules” — Court upholds rejection of request for government employment due to absence of legal entitlement
  • Madras high court holds that “levy of purchase tax is impermissible when the sale itself is liable to tax” — Court quashes Tribunal order and confirms that Section 7A cannot be invoked solely because the seller failed to remit tax
  • Madras high court holds that “delay in filing Form 10B should not come in the legitimate way of exemptions” — Court quashes rejection order and directs fresh assessment subject to charitable contribution
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top