Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news Raw Law

Unfiltered Legal Insights

  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Delhi High Court

Home - Delhi High Court - Page 5

Delhi High Court refuses to interfere with trial court’s rejection of additional witnesses — “Order XVI Rule 1A is not a licence for delay; sufficient cause must be shown”; petition dismissed
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court refuses to interfere with trial court’s rejection of additional witnesses — “Order XVI Rule 1A is not a licence for delay; sufficient cause must be shown”; petition dismissed

Court’s decision The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging a trial court order that refused permission to add two additional witnesses in a…
Posted by Rawlaw March 3, 2026
Delhi High Court sets aside draft assessment passed during communication gap — “Faceless regime cannot override binding judicial directions”; timelines extended by 60 days
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court sets aside draft assessment passed during communication gap — “Faceless regime cannot override binding judicial directions”; timelines extended by 60 days

Court’s decision The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition filed by Lindstrom Services India Private Limited and set aside a draft assessment order passed by the National Faceless Assessment…
Posted by Rawlaw March 3, 2026
Delhi High Court grants injunction to Novartis — “NOVIETS deceptively similar to NOVARTIS; triple identity established”; defendants restrained nationwide
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court grants injunction to Novartis — “NOVIETS deceptively similar to NOVARTIS; triple identity established”; defendants restrained nationwide

Court’s decision The Delhi High Court granted a sweeping interim injunction in favour of Novartis AG and its group entities, restraining Noviets Pharma and allied entities from using the marks…
Posted by Rawlaw March 3, 2026
Delhi High Court substitutes reinstatement with ₹11 lakh compensation in illegal retrenchment case — “240 days proved; non-compliance with Section 25F fatal, but regularisation beyond reference”; award partly modified
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court substitutes reinstatement with ₹11 lakh compensation in illegal retrenchment case — “240 days proved; non-compliance with Section 25F fatal, but regularisation beyond reference”; award partly modified

Court’s decision The Delhi High Court partly allowed a writ petition filed by Punjab & Sind Bank, upholding the finding of illegal termination of a temporary sub-staff employee but modifying…
Posted by Rawlaw March 3, 2026
Delhi High Court upholds cancellation of ‘THUKRAL’ trademark — “Prior user prevails over registration; writ court cannot cure procedural default”; petitions dismissed
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court upholds cancellation of ‘THUKRAL’ trademark — “Prior user prevails over registration; writ court cannot cure procedural default”; petitions dismissed

Court’s decision The Delhi High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the Intellectual Property Appellate Board’s order cancelling the trademark registration of the mark “THUKRAL” in Class 21 for brooms.…
Posted by Rawlaw March 3, 2026
Delhi High Court sets aside unsigned hearing report removing SSP manufacturer from NBS scheme — “Procedural lapses, proportionality ignored; fresh determination ordered for disputed subsidy period”
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court sets aside unsigned hearing report removing SSP manufacturer from NBS scheme — “Procedural lapses, proportionality ignored; fresh determination ordered for disputed subsidy period”

Court’s decision The Delhi High Court set aside the communication dated 24.07.2024 and the accompanying “Oral Hearing Report” whereby M/s Sai Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. had been continued outside the Nutrient…
Posted by Rawlaw March 3, 2026
patent
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court holds revocation petition maintainable despite expiry of patent and parallel invalidity defence — “Revocation operates retrospectively in rem” — appeal dismissed

Court’s decision The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal filed by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH challenging the maintainability of a revocation petition filed by Macleods Pharmaceuticals under Section 64 of…
Posted by Rawlaw February 26, 2026
railway siding contract
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court upholds arbitral award in railway siding contract dispute — “Section 37 not a forum for re-appreciation of facts” — IRCON’s appeal dismissed

Court’s decision The Delhi High Court dismissed an intra-court appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, affirming a Single Judge’s refusal to interfere with an arbitral award…
Posted by Rawlaw February 26, 2026
parking contract
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court rules MCD not bound to extend parking contracts — “Extension subject to competent authority’s discretion” — re-tender upheld

Court’s decision The Delhi High Court dismissed four writ petitions filed by authorised parking contractors challenging the Municipal Corporation of Delhi’s (MCD) decision to float a fresh tender for the…
Posted by Rawlaw February 26, 2026
conviciton, stolen mobile
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court upholds conviction of habitual receiver of stolen mobile phones — “Unbroken chain of recovery proves offences under Sections 411, 413, 414 IPC” — appeal dismissed

Court’s decision The Delhi High Court dismissed a criminal appeal filed by a man convicted for possession of stolen property and habitual dealing in stolen mobile phones. Upholding the trial…
Posted by Rawlaw February 26, 2026

Posts pagination

Previous page 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 85 Next page

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court Dismisses Father’s Habeas Corpus Plea For Return Of Child To UK; Holds “Custody Of The Minor Child With The Mother Is Not Illegal”, Welfare Of Child Remains Paramount
  • Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Release Of Attached Property In NSEL-MPID Case; Holds “MPID Act Has No Provision Regarding Release Of Property In Favour Of The Owner, After An Order Is Passed Permitting Auction”
  • Bombay High Court Refuses Licence For Slot Machines In Five-Star Hotel, Holds “1992 Goa Amendment Act Was Never Brought Into Force” In Daman And Diu; Says “Use Of Electronic Amusement/Slot Machines Remained Prohibited”
  • Bombay High Court Restores Written Statements In Commercial Suit Filed Within Statutory Outer Limit, Holds “Service Of Summons Without Copy Of Plaint And Accompaniments Would Not Constitute Valid Service In Law”
  • Bombay High Court Refuses To Decide ULC Possession Dispute In Writ Jurisdiction, Holds “Serious Disputed Questions Of Facts Arise”; Landowners Given Liberty To File Civil Suit
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top