Supreme Court Restores Specific Performance with Enhanced Consideration: Balancing Equity and Law in Property Agreements While Addressing Buyer’s Legal Rights and Seller’s Familial Hardship Under the Specific Relief Act, 1963

Supreme Court Restores Specific Performance with Enhanced Consideration: Balancing Equity and Law in Property Agreements While Addressing Buyer’s Legal Rights and Seller’s Familial Hardship Under the Specific Relief Act, 1963

Court’s Decision: The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment, which denied specific performance of the contract, and restored the Trial Court's decree with modifications. It directed the appellant…
Delhi High Court Upholds ₹77.96 Crore Arbitral Award in Telecom Dispute: “Exit Penalties and Contractual Obligations Cannot Be Escaped Due to Regulatory Challenges,” Reiterates Limited Scope of Judicial Review Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Delhi High Court Upholds ₹77.96 Crore Arbitral Award in Telecom Dispute: “Exit Penalties and Contractual Obligations Cannot Be Escaped Due to Regulatory Challenges,” Reiterates Limited Scope of Judicial Review Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court dismissed the challenge against the arbitral award dated 25.05.2019, which directed the petitioner to pay ₹77.96 crore (₹19.85 crore for unpaid invoices and ₹58.11…