Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news Raw Law

Unfiltered Legal Insights

  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Motor Accident Compensation

Home - Motor Accident Compensation

Supreme-Court-Enhances-Motor-Accident-Compensation-for-US-Based-Victims-Family-To-deny-future-prospects-is-contrary-to-the-fundamental-concept-of-human-attitude-which-always-intends-to-live-with-Dynamism
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Enhances Motor Accident Compensation for US-Based Victim’s Family: “To deny future prospects is contrary to the fundamental concept of human attitude which always intends to live with dynamism”

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal by the claimants, enhancing the compensation from ₹1,17,20,200 to ₹1,60,15,280 by including the “future prospects” component as laid down in National…
Posted by Rawlaw August 12, 2025
Delhi-High-Court-Rules-That-Two-Skilled-Attendants-Must-Be-Provided-for-Accident-Victims-in-Vegetative-State-Affirms-24-Hour-Care-Is-a-Right-Not-a-Privilege
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Rules That Two Skilled Attendants Must Be Provided for Accident Victims in Vegetative State, Affirms “24-Hour Care Is a Right, Not a Privilege”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court modified the MACT’s award, holding that in cases of 100% permanent disability with prolonged vegetative state, attendant charges should reflect the cost of skilled…
Posted by Rawlaw July 9, 2025
Delhi-High-Court-Absence-of-zebra-crossing-is-not-proof-of-contributory-negligence-—-Court-reduces-deduction-to-10-Functional-disability-is-distinct-from-permanent-disability-impact-on-earning
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court: “Absence of zebra crossing is not proof of contributory negligence” — Court reduces deduction to 10% – Functional disability is distinct from permanent disability; impact on earning capacity must be specifically proved.

Court’s Decision In an appeal, the Delhi High Court partly allowed the appeal filed against the MACT award dated 16.12.2020. Justice Amit Mahajan held that the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal…
Posted by Rawlaw June 18, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court: “Unsuccessful Party Can Also Seek Section 9 Protection”; L&T Directed To Keep ₹150 Crore Bank Guarantee Alive In ONGC Arbitration
  • “He Who Seeks Equity Must Do Equity”: Supreme Court Holds Specific Performance Decree Becomes Inexecutable If Balance Sale Consideration Is Not Deposited Within Time
  • Bombay High Court Rejects Tenants’ Plea To Add New Developer; Says Application Prima Facie Appears “Moved And Financed” By Proposed Developer, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs
  • Bombay High Court Refuses To Cancel Bail In Pending Murder Appeal; Says “Bail Once Granted Ought Not To Be Cancelled” Without Strong Grounds
  • Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank And Phoenix ARC Officials Filed After Recovery Proceedings; Says “Personal Vendetta Writ Large”, Investigation Would Be Abuse Of Process
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top