Delhi High Court Dismisses Challenges to Eviction Orders: Reaffirms Landlords' Right Under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act to Evict Tenants for Bonafide Personal Use When No Suitable Alternative Accommodation Exists
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Dismisses Challenges to Eviction Orders: Reaffirms Landlords’ Right Under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act to Evict Tenants for Bonafide Personal Use When No Suitable Alternative Accommodation Exists

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction orders passed by the Additional Rent Controller (ARC). It affirmed the landlords' bonafide requirement for the premises for residential and commercial…
December 5, 2024
Jammu & Kashmir HC Grants Bail in UAPA Case: Allegations of Militant Meeting with Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed, and Poster Recovery Lack Specific Evidence Linking Appellants to Terrorist Acts — "While UAPA Is Stringent, It Does Not Warrant Indefinite Detention Without Trial Progress or Compelling Evidence"
Posted inNews

Jammu & Kashmir HC Grants Bail in UAPA Case: Allegations of Militant Meeting with Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed, and Poster Recovery Lack Specific Evidence Linking Appellants to Terrorist Acts — “While UAPA Is Stringent, It Does Not Warrant Indefinite Detention Without Trial Progress or Compelling Evidence”

Court’s Decision The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh granted bail to the appellants, overturning the trial court’s orders. The court emphasized the lack of prima facie evidence…
December 5, 2024
Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition Alleging Corruption in Pragati Maidan Redevelopment Project: "Involvement of Government Entities in the Redevelopment Project Did Not Automatically Make the Case a Matter of Public Interest"; Highlights Alternative Remedies Like Arbitration and Section 156(3) CrPC
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition Alleging Corruption in Pragati Maidan Redevelopment Project: “Involvement of Government Entities in the Redevelopment Project Did Not Automatically Make the Case a Matter of Public Interest”; Highlights Alternative Remedies Like Arbitration and Section 156(3) CrPC

1. Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court rejected the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, finding that: The allegations primarily stemmed from private contractual disputes rather than matters…
December 5, 2024
Delhi High Court: Does an Application for Substitution of Legal Heirs, Filed Beyond the Limitation Period, Automatically Lead to Abatement of the Case? Delhi High Court Rules: “Procedural Rules Must Not Prevent Substantial Justice Unless Delay Is Caused by Gross Negligence”
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court: Does an Application for Substitution of Legal Heirs, Filed Beyond the Limitation Period, Automatically Lead to Abatement of the Case? Delhi High Court Rules: “Procedural Rules Must Not Prevent Substantial Justice Unless Delay Is Caused by Gross Negligence”

Court’s Decision: The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenants' revision petition challenging the orders of the Rent Controller and the Rent Control Tribunal (RCT) that allowed the substitution of legal…
December 5, 2024