Bombay High Court Declares Forced Land Acquisition Without Monetary Compensation Unlawful: Upholds Property Rights Under Article 300A, Rejects Imposition of TDR/FSI Without Consent, and Directs Authorities to Follow Due Process Under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act

Bombay High Court Declares Forced Land Acquisition Without Monetary Compensation Unlawful: Upholds Property Rights Under Article 300A, Rejects Imposition of TDR/FSI Without Consent, and Directs Authorities to Follow Due Process Under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act

Court’s Decision: The High Court ruled that the municipal authorities' actions—demolishing the petitioner’s property without compensation and attempting to force the acceptance of TDR/FSI—were illegal. The court held that land…
Allahabad High Court Upholds Bank’s Right to Forfeit Auction Deposit: Reaffirms Strict Three-Month Payment Deadline Under SARFAESI Act, Rejects Bidder’s Plea for Further Extension, and Strengthens Legal Certainty in Time-Bound Asset Recovery Processes

Allahabad High Court Upholds Bank’s Right to Forfeit Auction Deposit: Reaffirms Strict Three-Month Payment Deadline Under SARFAESI Act, Rejects Bidder’s Plea for Further Extension, and Strengthens Legal Certainty in Time-Bound Asset Recovery Processes

1. Court’s Decision The writ petition was dismissed because the petitioners had already been given the maximum three-month extension to pay the balance of the auction price. The court upheld…